Luke 18: States of Consciousness — Strength & Weakness

Compare with the original King James text

🔍 Explore Verse Ranges in Luke 18

Quick Insights

The persistent widow is the psyche that refuses to let go of a just inner desire until the resistant parts yield; steady attention wears down the unwilling judge of habit.
The Pharisee and the publican portray two attitudes of self: one fortified by proud identity, the other stripped to honest need, and the latter opens the door to transformation.
The childlike state describes an unguarded imagination that receives possibility without analytic obstruction, and that receptivity is the access point to a new inner world.
The rich ruler and the blind beggar reveal how attachment and inner blindness block entrance into a living reality, while humble faith and clarified desire effect immediate change.

What is the Main Point of Luke 18?

At the heart of the chapter is a psychological law: sustained inner attention and honest recognition of lack move the unseen into manifestation, while pride and attachment defend old worlds; faith here means an assumed inner reality that shapes perception and outcome.

What is the Spiritual Meaning of Luke 18?

The story of the persistent widow is not about a legal victory but about a steady interior insistence. When some part of us wants a shift, the first opponent is the conditioned judge that fears change and confers reality by refusal. Continuous, humble petition is the practice of keeping attention fixed on a desired end until the rigid center of resistance relents. That yielding is not external grace poured from nowhere but an internal reordering: persistence softens the habitual citadel and allows a new scene to be felt as true. The contrast of the two pray-ers dramatizes how identity colors creative capacity. One mind rehearses its righteousness, feeding the felt sense of separateness and thus reinforcing the very walls that block change. The other, honest and contrite, refuses to perform and instead acknowledges need; that simple admission dissolves defenses and creates a receptive field. In psychological terms, humility opens the imagination to conceive and inhabit an alternative, and inhabiting it is the act by which the interior becomes exterior. Scenes of children, the rich ruler, and the blind beggar are stages of consciousness. Children embody the soft, unquestioning assumption necessary for birth of a new inner kingdom; they trust sensation and possibility before the critic arrives. The rich ruler shows how identity tied to possession or position clamps the imagination into limitation; wealth here reads as attachment to old evidence, making impossible what requires a psychological unloosing. The blind man represents focused desire that pierces social reproof; his cry is the concentrated imagining of sight that is answered because his inner posture matches the state he asks for. In all, the chapter maps a path from attention and humility through imaginative assumption to realized change.

Key Symbols Decoded

The unjust judge stands for the inner adjudicator, the part that measures worth by habit and fears the upheaval of conceding to desire. He does not fear the divine but resists because change threatens established identity; the widow's unrelenting approach is the concentrated will that refuses to be neutralized by internal dismissal. When persistence wears down the judge, it signals a reorientation of consciousness where old verdicts are replaced by newly accepted possibilities. The temple, prayers, children, riches, blindness and healing are not only external motifs but living states. The temple points to the inner sanctuary where imagination and attention meet; prayers are the rehearsals that shape it. Children are the receptive state that accepts without complex analysis; riches are symbolic of attachments that weigh the mind down. Blindness and the granting of sight portray the movement from not-knowing to knowing, from assumption to evidence. Reading these symbols as psychological states shows how our inner drama produces the world we inhabit.

Practical Application

Begin by noticing the judge inside, the voice that says what is safe and what is impossible, and bring a steady, compassionate insistence to the desire that feels true. Instead of arguing with the critic, keep returning attention to an embodied scene of the outcome already achieved, feeling it as real in small moments each day until the inner verdict softens and actions align with the new assumption. Practice humility as a tool: allow yourself the radical act of admitting lack without shame, and let that honesty open imagination rather than close it. Use childlike sensory detail to rehearse the desired state — imagine sights, sounds, posture, and gratitude as if the change has occurred — and watch how relationships, choices, and opportunities begin to mirror the inner shift. The work is not magic but disciplined feeling and attention that reshape the mind and, through it, reality.

The Inner Drama of Persistent Prayer and Humble Faith

Luke 18 read as a map of the inner theatre reveals a continuous psychological drama in which states of consciousness talk, struggle, collapse and are reborn. The chapter is not primarily a record of historical events but a sequence of imaginal movements that describe how inner states create outer outcomes, how persistence of feeling reshapes resistance, and how surrender and humility open the door to vision. Read like this, every scene names a mood, a posture of attention, and the imagination as the operative artist that sculpts experience.

The parable of the widow and the unjust judge is a picture of desire persisting within a mind that seems indifferent. The city is the field of attention, the judge a part of the psyche that sits in judgment and resists change. He fears neither God nor man; in inner language he is the stubborn ego, indifferent to higher longing or social appeal. The widow is not a literal woman but the single, sustained desire that comes from a place of inner poverty and need. Her continual coming is the repeated assumption, the imaginal act returned to again and again. She does not make new arguments; she inhabits a feeling and keeps living there until the judge, tired of the cadence, yields. This is how imagination works: repetition does not wear the world down so much as it changes the quality of attention. The judge acts not because he is convinced by logic but because the persistent mood exhausts his resistance. The scene teaches the practical law that sustained feeling, even when opposed by an apparently immovable part of self, will eventually rearrange conditions. Prayer, here, is sustained assumption; not pleading before an external deity but the unbroken rehearsal of a felt state until the interior jurist moves and the outer world reflects the new interior.

When the narrator asks whether the Son of man will find faith on the earth, the question becomes existential: will the human field develop the sustained assumption required for its own transformation? The parable leans toward encouraging that discipline. To be faithful is to hold an imaginal end as if already present and to resist the temper of discouragement.

The story of the Pharisee and the publican stands as a contrast between two inner postures. The temple is the place of inner worship, and the two men are two ways of relating to the sacred. The Pharisee is the self-righteous state, a defensive identity that imagines itself secure and superior. His prayer catalogs virtues; it is a mirror polishing his self-image. That mirror is a closed circuit: it reflects the self back to itself and so cannot be transformed. The publican, standing afar off and smiting his breast, represents the receptive, contrite state that admits lack and opens toward assistance beyond the ego. He does not craft arguments to prove worthiness; he registers humility and dependence. The psychological verdict — that the publican goes home justified — teaches that inner realignment depends more on honest recognition of limitation and the humble assumption of mercy than on self-exaltation. Humility is not abasement but the receptive mood by which imagination can work from within. In practice, the posture that yields to the reality of felt desire without defensive commentary is the posture that allows transformation.

The incident with children names innocence and receptivity as keys to entering the kingdom of God. Children are the natural state of acceptance, the capacity to take in without skepticism. Psychologically, the kingdom of God is a state of consciousness available when one stops protecting a constructed self and surrenders to a simple receive. The injunction to become like little children is an instruction to catch the mood of unquestioning imagination, to trust inner vision without the corrosive commentary of doubt.

The rich young ruler dramatizes attachment and identification. His question about inheriting eternal life masks his unwillingness to exchange his visible security for an invisible treasure. The command to sell everything and distribute to the poor names the radical inner requirement: to let go of outer identifications so that inner riches can be possessed. Riches here are not only money but any identity, role, or possession that props up the sense of self. His sorrow when told to relinquish these things exposes the psychological truth that letting go feels like loss even though it is the precondition for inner gain. The needle and the camel image compresses this: a rigid, fixed identity cannot pass through the fine pore of transformed awareness; only what is surrendered and reimagined can pass. The follow-up claim that what is impossible with men is possible with God reframes impossibility as a statement about ordinary effort versus imaginal operation. God, in this language, is the faculty of living assumption — the creative imagination that carries the impossible end as if already accomplished, thereby making it possible.

When the disciples say they have left all to follow, the passage speaks to the group dynamic of inner seekers who consciously trade outer securities for the life of imaginal allegiance. The promise of manifold return describes how the interior economy rewards dispossession with a richer outward life once the inner kingdom is established.

Jesus taking the twelve and predicting the journey to Jerusalem is the mapping of the inner path toward the core of transformation. Jerusalem is not only a city but the center of the psyche where old narratives are crucified and a new self is born. The prophecies of betrayal, mockery, scourging, death and resurrection are inner processes: humiliation of the ego, the collapse of false identity, and the consequent rebirth into sight. The disciples do not understand because the operations of deep transformation are largely unconscious until they are experienced. This sequence reminds us that imagination must sometimes pass through symbolic death before the restored vision is granted.

The final scene with the blind man at Jericho offers a vivid lesson in attention and calling. Jericho is the threshold, the place between what was and what is becoming. The blind man seated by the roadside is the part of consciousness that recognizes its lack and calls out. His cry, addressed to Jesus the son of David, marks the act of naming the higher self, the lineage of promise within. The crowd that rebukes him is the social and inner censor that attempts to enforce silence. The blind man intensifies his cry in spite of suppression; again persistence of feeling and intention wins. When he is brought to Jesus and asked what he wants, the encounter turns inward: imagination must be given a clear object. His request to receive sight is a simple, specific assumption. The reply, receive thy sight; thy faith hath saved thee, equates saving with the sustained imaginal posture. The immediacy of his recovery and the fact that he followed glorifyingly shows the psychological law that once the feeling of the wish fulfilled is assumed, behavior realigns instantly. Sight here is not merely physical vision but inner clarity and orientation. The healed man follows, which means practice becomes action: imagination changes attitude and then changes conduct.

Taken together, the chapter teaches a method. First, identify the mood that corresponds to the outcome you seek. Second, persist in that mood without argument, letting the imaginal act settle into feeling. Third, relinquish attachments that contradict the assumed state. Fourth, receive humbly and like a child. The creative power that pulses through every scene is consciousness itself — imagination given feeling and duration. Scripture, when read as inner drama, shows repeated instances of this law: repetition wears down resistance, humility opens the door, childlike receptivity admits the kingdom, and defining the desire concretely triggers its realization.

The practical implication is direct. The mind will produce the outer world corresponding to the dominant moods it carries. The unjust judge will move not to logic but to exhaustion of resistance; the Pharisee will remain boxed by self-image; the publican and the blind man will be collected into a new life by honest, simple, persistent assumption. The creative agent is not outside but within. Keep the mood, do not faint, and interpret every challenge as an invitation to a deeper imaginal act. The chapter ends not with a moralizing note but with a demonstration: sustained faith becomes sight, and sight becomes following. The inner theatre closes with the promise that the imagination, properly used, is the engine of transformation.

Common Questions About Luke 18

What does Neville say about the Pharisee and the tax collector (Luke 18:9–14) as states of consciousness?

The two men are not moral case studies but two states of consciousness: the Pharisee is the self-righteous state that identifies with attributes and appearance, while the tax collector is the humble state that recognizes lack and turns inward to imagination as remedy. Justification is a change of state; the tax collector’s admission and inward appeal create the state that receives. To be justified is to assume the consciousness of the forgiven, the desired condition, rather than defend or prove oneself. When you abandon outer virtues for inner assumption and feel the relief of being received, reality rearranges to manifest that inner state (Luke 18:9–14).

What does 'become like little children' (Luke 18:15–17) mean in Neville's teaching about imagination and faith?

To become like little children is to recover the natural faculty of vivid, unquestioning imagination, the effortless acceptance and trust that precedes doubt. Children receive without complex reasoning; they live in the play of feeling and make-believe that becomes real to them. Spiritually this means abandon skepticism, embrace wonder, and assume the end with the simplicity and conviction of a child; let imagination supply the facts. The kingdom of God is entered by that receptive state, so cultivate trust, sensory-rich mental scenes, and the carefree assurance of the desired result until it becomes your inner reality, then watch outward evidence conform (Luke 18:15–17).

How does Neville Goddard interpret the parable of the persistent widow in Luke 18:1–8 for manifestation practice?

Neville Goddard reads the persistent widow as the imagination that will not let go of an assumed end until the outer circumstance yields; the unjust judge represents the sleeping subconscious that moves only by repeated, living assumption. Prayer here is not begging but dwelling in the state of the fulfilled desire with feeling, persisting until the subconscious accepts it as fact. The widow’s continual coming is the daily imaginal act, the refusal to faint when appearances contradict. Practically, you assume the scene implying your wish fulfilled, repeat it with feeling until it becomes natural, and trust that what you persistently assume inwardly will appear, as the parable implies (Luke 18:1–8).

How would Neville apply the rich young ruler story (Luke 18:18–30) to releasing attachment and creating what you desire?

Selling all is symbolic language for relinquishing identification with present possessions, roles, and self-concepts that block imagination; the command to follow is an invitation to take on a new inner state. The ruler’s sorrow shows his clinging to identity. To create, you must ‘sell’ those identifications by assuming the state of the fulfilled desire and living from that inner conviction, not by external struggle. The promise that what is impossible with men is possible with God points to imagination’s power: when you truly assume a new consciousness and persist in it, the outer world yields, and you find yourself receiving manifold more in this present time and beyond (Luke 18:18–30).

What practical imaginal exercises from Neville correspond to Luke 18's themes of persistence, humility, and childlike faith?

Begin by selecting one scene that implies your fulfilled desire and rehearse it nightly with sensory detail and feeling, persisting even when daylight contradicts the scene; this is the widow’s continual coming. For humility, practice the inner admission of need and picture yourself receiving mercy or provision, allowing the relief of being forgiven to settle, which shifts consciousness away from self-justification. To recover childlike faith, play the scene as if it is already true without argument, use simple presuppositions during the day, and fall asleep in the assumed state; repeated, feeling-saturated imaginal acts will impress the subconscious and bring the external evidence into alignment with your new inner state.

How does Neville explain the 'camel through the eye of a needle' (Luke 18:25) — can the impossible be achieved through consciousness?

The hyperbolic impossibility speaks to the difficulty of a man clinging to earthly identity passing into the kingdom of imaginative creation; yet what is impossible by natural means becomes possible by changing consciousness. God here signifies the creative imagination within you. When you abandon limiting identifications and assume the desired state with feeling, the subconscious rearranges circumstances so the seemingly impossible is made real. It demands persistent inner revision and a willingness to be transformed, but impossibility is only a proclamation about human effort; with imagination acting as God, miracles are the natural result of assumed states (Luke 18:25; compare Luke 18:27).