Leviticus 11: Clean and Unclean

Compare with the original King James text

🔍 Explore Verse Ranges in Leviticus 11

Quick Insights

The chapter maps a careful inner taxonomy: some impressions nourish the self and some defile it, and we are invited to choose what we feed and what we reject.
Clean and unclean are not moral judgments imposed from outside but descriptions of states of consciousness that either sustain life or contaminate perception.
Rituals of touching, washing, breaking, and separating point to psychological acts—contact, purification, release—that alter how imagination shapes visible outcomes.
Holiness is practical attention: to sanctify is to cultivate an inner environment where imagination can form reality untroubled by creeping, reactive fears and random impulses.

What is the Main Point of Leviticus 11?

At the heart of the chapter is a single, plain inner law: what you allow into the theater of your mind becomes the substance of your life, so you must distinguish, cleanse, and intentionally steward your mental diet. The distinctions offered are psychological tools for creating a clear field of consciousness in which imagination can operate with authority; every contact with doubt, every unexamined habit, every belief carried like a carcass has the power to muddle your creations until you actively separate, wash, or discard it.

What is the Spiritual Meaning of Leviticus 11?

The list of animals and the commands around eating, touching, and cleansing describe how different impulses and images function in the psyche. Some images are wholesome because they are whole—complete, integrated, able to be digested by the creative faculty; others are partial, broken, or aimless and therefore produce confusion when entertained. To 'eat' is to assimilate an idea into identity; to touch a carcass is to allow a dead thought to cling, and the contamination that follows is the spread of lifeless patterns through feeling and imagination. The spiritual work is to learn to taste internally, to know what thought nourishes future being and what thought perpetuates disorder. The repeated rules about vessels, water, and breaking point to processes of purification and containment. A vessel that held an unclean thing must be cleansed or, if made of earth and irrevocably stained, broken; this is the inner recognition that some forms of thought or habit cannot be rehabilitated within their old containers. Washing garments and waiting until evening reflect a patient, embodied practice of allowing new arrangements to settle; they name stages of transformation rather than instant moral triumph. Where contamination falls on seed and is later watered, the result is a created problem, teaching that careless attention given to a fertile imagination spreads unwanted forms. Finally, holiness is described not as abstraction but as a state of disciplined imagination. To be holy is to maintain a clean field of attention, to refuse the creeping, ambiguous images that sap clarity and to affirm instead the stable, integrated images that build life. The divine declaration to be holy functions as a reminder that the source of creation moves with those who learn to discriminate and care for their inner table; sanctity is therefore less a status than a sustained practice of internal nutrition and selective imagination.

Key Symbols Decoded

Hooves and cud become metaphors for habits and reflective capacities: the cloven hoof suggests a divided attention, the chewing of the cud an ability to reprocess impressions until they are wholesome. Creatures that appear similar yet fail one test or the other are the psychological traps—voices that seem reasonable but lack integration, or stable habits that are blind to higher insight. Water and vessels represent the medium and form of imagination; clear water in a pure vessel sustains life, while spilled contamination or a cracked container shows how an unguarded mind leaks influence into undesired areas of experience. Carcasses, abominations, and creeping things name the dead residues of past fear and trauma that continue to move under the skin of daily thought. They are not moral monsters but psychic debris: thoughts that crawl, persist, and soil creative intent. Breaking an earthen vessel is the acceptance that some ways of thinking must be shattered to free the imagination, while washing and waiting demonstrate the regenerative power of deliberate, patient inner hygiene.

Practical Application

Begin by auditing your inner menu: spend a day noting what you 'eat' mentally—news, conversations, images—and how each item affects feeling and creativity. When an image or habit reveals itself as corrosive, practice a symbolic separation: visualize taking that thought like a carcass from your hands, placing it into water, and either washing it clean into a river of release or setting it on a field where it can be broken down and returned to earth. Use a nightly ritual of mental washing where you imagine changing garments of thought, laying aside the day’s worn patterns and putting on clean, chosen images that express the life you intend to live. Treat your imagination as a garden: do not water seeds of doubt and petty fear, and if contamination falls upon fertile soil, remove or neutralize it before pouring more attention there. Over time this becomes a steady practice of discernment—learning which impressions are food and which are rubbish—so that the acts of touching, washing, and breaking become simple interior gestures that align perception with creative purpose and allow the imagination to produce a world that reflects your chosen inner law.

Boundaries of Belonging: The Sacred Logic of Clean and Unclean

Leviticus 11 read as a psychological drama turns a catalog of dietary laws into a careful, inner choreography of attention, imagination and identity. The chapter stages a conversation between higher consciousness and the personality: the voice that says "Speak unto the children of Israel" is the inward Teacher addressing the mind and its faculties. The list of animals, birds and creeping things are not external fauna but distinct states of mind and modes of attention. The injunctions about eating, touching, washing and breaking are directives about what the self should feed on, what it must avoid, when it must purify, and when it must let the vessel that contains a dead idea be destroyed.

The clean beast, described as that which parts the hoof, is cloven, and chews the cud, represents a mature faculty of imagination that both discriminates and ruminates. To part the hoof is to be divided in attention: one needs an inner differentiation between the observing I and the object observed. To chew the cud is the capacity for interior reflection and re-presentation: the mind returns the image inwardly, digests it, and transforms it into conviction. A state that possesses both qualities is safe to feed from; it produces clear, integrated acts in outer life because inner faculty has both discernment and reflective power.

By contrast the camel, the hare and the coney are given as beasts that chew the cud but do not divide the hoof. Psychologically they are reflective imaginations without a stable boundary between observer and observed. They brood and ruminate but lack the discrimination that keeps fantasy from masquerading as fact. They are tempting mental processes because they feel inwardly rich, yet they fail to be grounded. Feeding on them produces airy imaginings that cannot stand in the marketplace of action. The swine, whose hoof is cloven but which does not chew the cud, symbolizes outward conformity with no inward assimilation. This is thought that looks disciplined — it walks the forms, shows the outward signs of culture — but it never digests impressions into inner conviction. Eating this state yields behavior without conviction, ethical posture without transformation.

Fish with fins and scales represent those imaginative acts that both move creatively in the sea of feeling and bear evidence to the world. Fins are motion, active skill in feeling; scales are testimony, a structure that registers and refracts light so others can see the condition within. Thoughts that have 'fins and scales' are fit to be eaten: they are imaginal acts that can navigate emotion and also be witnessed by others as palpable consequence. Any water-creature lacking fins and scales — ambiguous or formless mental content without means of movement or evidence — becomes an abomination. Those are fantasies that cannot swim purposefully and cannot be seen to bear fruit; their interior life stagnates and breeds doubt when exposed to outer reality.

The list of birds and predators — eagle, raven, owl, hawk, vultures — are symbolic of corrosive, rapacious modes of thought: suspicion, scavenging resentment, nocturnal fears and predatory judgment. These states feed on the dead, the past, on what has been discarded. To 'not eat' such birds is to refuse internalization of scavenging cognition. The injunctions against 'fowls that creep going upon all four' point to ideas that imitate higher faculty but are grounded in animal instinct. Clean thoughts rise; creeping ones stay low.

The chapter also distinguishes between certain flying creeping things — locusts, grasshoppers, beetles — that are permitted. These are small, leaping imaginal energies: sudden insight, childlike spontaneity, the capacity to take a leap of faith. They move by a different economy than the predators; they advance by springing up. These are the quick, energetic acts of imagination that can change a field quickly and are permitted because they are honest about their small scope and don’t pretend to be the loftier faculties.

Touching the carcass, bearing it, or letting dead matter fall upon household vessels are metaphors for contamination in consciousness. A carcass is a thought gone stale — a belief whose life is spent but which still occupies mental furniture. To touch it is to reactivate what is dead and allow it to taint experience: an old resentment, a resolved fear, a condemnation. The law says that contact makes one unclean until the evening. Evening is a symbolic time of integration, completion and rest; it represents the period in which the mind moves through a cycle and is reconstituted. Impurity is thus not permanent but conditional: if the imagination lingers over the corpse it becomes a contaminant; if one allows the process of re-orientation to take its course until the evening, the psyche is purified by completion.

Washing clothes after contact is a ritual of repentance and revision of assumptions. To wash is to revise the script and change the garments of identity. These clothes are not literal robes but the habitual concepts and labels through which the self moves. Washing them is the deliberate inner act of cleansing belief structures, of re-imagining the self-image.

Earthen vessels that have had carcasses fall into them are to be broken. Psychologically, this is radical but necessary: certain containers of consciousness — belief systems, roles, memories — when polluted must be destroyed rather than superficially cleaned. An earthen vessel is a limited explanatory frame; once a dead idea has entered it, patching it up preserves contamination. Breaking the vessel signals decisive abandonment of an old schema so that a new one may be forged. Where something porous and fragile has been penetrated, the right response is not cosmetic cleaning but decisive termination.

Yet the chapter balances this severity with mercy: a 'fountain or pit' remains clean even if touched by carcass. The fountain is a primary source of imaginative life — the living well of awareness. A pit, a deep receptacle of feeling and presence, can remain pure if it is not mixed with waters of reflection that stir dead matter. The teaching here is precise: primary sources of creativity are resilient to accidental contamination; it is only when you actively water dead seeds that the seed becomes unclean. The passage that says seed which falls upon the ground is clean unless water is put upon it shows how initial creative intent remains pure until one nurtures it with negative attention. What you water grows. If dead ideas fall upon fledgling seeds of intention, they remain harmless until you habitually water them with attention, doubt, commentary. This is a practical law of imagination: do not irrigate dead conclusions.

Ultimately the law of clean and unclean in Leviticus 11 is an internal taxonomy enabling individuals to make profitable choices about mental diet. It is a call to sanctify the imagination: to distinguish between the appetites of instinct and the cultured cuisine of reflective, discriminating creative acts. Sanctification is not moralization here; it is an instruction in taste. The command 'for I am the LORD your God: ye shall therefore be holy' functions as the reminder of origin: creative power arises from a single source of awareness. Holiness, therefore, is constancy to that source. To be holy is to feed on what accords with the identity of the I that creates.

Read this chapter as a manual for inner housekeeping. Some items must never be taken into the living being of attention because they produce distressing outer results. Some imaginal energies may appear virtuous but lack the inner discriminant and are therefore to be avoided. Practical measures — refusing to reanimate the carcass, washing the clothes of the mind, breaking vessels that cannot be reset, guarding the fountain — are instructions for cultivating effective imagination so it creates rather than repeats dead patterns.

Seen this way, Leviticus 11 does not legislate food but instructs the mind about its food. The outer world will always mirror what we feed upon inside: what is chewed, what is allowed to pass, what is watered, what is left to rot. The creative power operates when imagination is disciplined — when it both perceives distinctions and digests inner impressions. The chapter invites a rigorous, compassionate stewardship of inner life, because the oldest command remains true: what you feed becomes you.

Common Questions About Leviticus 11

Are the dietary laws in Leviticus 11 meant to be literal or symbolic for inner transformation?

While historically literal laws were given, the heart of Leviticus 11 reads powerfully as symbolic instruction for inner transformation: the commandments to avoid certain creatures and to be holy point to an inner sanctification in which one discriminates among impressions and keeps the mind clean (Leviticus 11). The living God’s call to holiness frames a psychological and spiritual practice of controlling attention, ridding oneself of degrading imaginal foods, and nourishing those images that align with your desire. Seen this way, the laws are safeguards for consciousness, practical means to assume a new state and thereby change outer experience.

Can the 'mental diet' idea in Neville's teachings be used as a modern reading of Leviticus 11?

Yes; the mental diet is a contemporary articulation of the distinction between clean and unclean in Leviticus 11: what you ingest emotionally and imaginally determines your state and destiny. To practice this is to be selective about inner pictures, conversations, and memories, to brush away fear and to feed sustained, vivid assumptions of the wished-for end. The Scripture’s command to separate the pure from the impure becomes a daily practice of refusing attention to contrary evidence and persistently entertaining the chosen scene until it feels real, for imagination is the womb in which outer events are formed and born.

How does Leviticus 11's teaching about clean and unclean animals relate to states of consciousness?

Leviticus 11, read inwardly, describes not dietary rules alone but the mind’s need to distinguish what it admits and accepts; what is “clean” becomes the reigning state and what is “unclean” must be excluded if you would be holy and raised in consciousness (Leviticus 11). The animals are symbolic qualities and habitual imaginal scenes; to chew the cud is to ruminate imaginatively, and to divide the hoof is to be settled in assumption. Thus the law instructs a sovereign mind that chooses its inner diet, for imagination creates reality and the state you persist in governs outward circumstances, making sanctification an act of inner discrimination and sustained assumption.

What would Neville Goddard say is the practical application of Leviticus 11 for manifesting desires?

Neville would point to Leviticus 11 as an instruction to police your inner life: choose only that which you will entertain and nurture in your imagination and reject that which contradicts your assumed end (Leviticus 11). Practically, this means refuse mentally to feed scenes of lack, criticism, or failure, and instead live each day in the end by imagining the fulfilled scene until it feels present. Treat undesirable impressions like unclean food—do not touch them with attention—and cultivate instead the habits of feeling and assumption that produce the reality you desire; your consistent state of consciousness will externalize as the world you experience.

What daily visualization or 'living in the end' practice ties Leviticus 11 to Neville-style revision?

A daily practice that marries Leviticus 11 and Neville-style revision begins each morning by choosing what you will permit into your mind—deciding on a clean, specific end—and each night by revising any scenes that felt unclean or contrary during the day (Leviticus 11). Mentally replay those moments as you wished them to be, infusing each revised scene with the feeling of fulfillment until the new state is settled. Before sleep, live in the end: imagine a short, vivid scene showing your wish fulfilled and feel it real; by refusing to chew the cud of negative scenes and persistently feeding the chosen image, the outer world conforms to your assumed state.