Jeremiah 14: Drought of the Inner Consciousness

Compare with the original King James text

🔍 Explore Verse Ranges in Jeremiah 14

Quick Insights

The chapter describes an inner drought: imagination withdraws its nourishing rain and the conscious life withers into fear, shame, and visible scarcity.
The voice of false reassurance — prophets promising peace — represents the seductive self-talk that denies inner conditions and postpones the necessary confrontation with reality.
Divine silence in the text becomes the unconverted awareness, the part of mind that refuses to cooperate until responsibility is taken and the imagination is redirected with integrity.
The drama ends in an appeal: even amid acknowledged failure the name, the identity we carry, can be a point of return where healing happens if we stop wandering and reimagine our state from within.

What is the Main Point of Jeremiah 14?

At the heart of the chapter is a psychological principle: outer calamity reflects inner drought. When attention deserts its fertile fields and the creative imagination becomes idle or deceptive, life shows up as famine, sickness, and loss. The remedy is not pleading for external relief but a deliberate reoccupation of inner perception — an assumption of a different identity and the steady nourishment of feeling that restores inner rainfall. This is not blame but an invitation to accept responsibility for the climate of consciousness and to enact a faithful interior reversal.

What is the Spiritual Meaning of Jeremiah 14?

Reading the passage as states of consciousness, the barren land and failed wells are literal metaphors for drained attention and disenchanted expectation. Children sent to the waters who return empty represent the parts of self that seek sustenance from memory or old habit and come back ashamed because the well has been exhausted by habit and unbelief. The surprise of a saviour absent or a helper who seems like a stranger points to a moment when the self that once answered as a refuge has been neglected; identity has been treated as a passerby rather than the sovereign presence it can be. In that recognition there is both indictment and mercy: the cry acknowledges wrongdoing — wandering attention and repeated misassumptions — yet it also points to the possibility of being called back by remembrance of one’s true name.

The section about false prophets is a caution about comforting narratives that promise peace without changing the inner life. These voices are imaginative defenses that keep us from confronting the drought; they declare that all will be well without the inner labor of re-visioning. The text insists that such hollow assurances will be consumed by the very consequences they deny, which is to say the psyche will dismantle the stories that obstruct authentic repair. Tears that flow night and day become a disciplined awareness — not mere lament, but a sustained witnessing that refuses to be anesthetized. From this witnessing arises a depth of compassion and urgency that can compel the imagination to re-create a nourishing reality.

Key Symbols Decoded

Drought and no rain are states of withheld attention: the mind’s neglect of creative imagining that normally gives birth to form. The pits and empty vessels are memory and habit returning nothing because they are searched without a new, enfolding feeling; they are the old channels that can hold water only when the living perception pours into them. The wild animals standing on high places with failing eyes depict instinctive drives made desperate by lack of nourishing inner meaning — the natural faculties are present but starved because purpose and image are absent. The prophets who speak peace are the parts of consciousness that prefer comforting illusions to the hard work of transformation; they are attempts at cohesion that fail when reality demands active imagination.

The plea for the name — the entreaty not to be abandoned — decodes as an appeal to self-identity to remember itself as source. The covenant and throne language point to an inner agreement, an attuned posture of consciousness that once governed life and must be re-taken. Tears running day and night symbolize a continuous, receptive feeling; they are not merely sorrow but a fluid state that softens the soil of perception so that new images can be planted and take root. Thus, the whole canvas becomes an anatomy of psychological functions: shame, false comfort, culpability, remembering, and the healing potency of renewed imagination.

Practical Application

Begin by observing the quality of your inner weather with unblinking curiosity. Name the drought: where are you withholding attention, indulging soothing falsehoods, or expecting rescue without changing your imagining? Sit quietly and feel into the shame, fear, or hunger without trying to fix it immediately; sustained feeling is the rain that loosens hardened patterns. Then deliberately cultivate a new assumption about yourself that is both believable and imaginative — imagine a simple inner scene in which you are tended, productive, or at ease, and hold it with sensory feeling until it settles into the body as real.

Turn away from the easy prophecies of peace that ask nothing of you and instead practice faithful imagination daily: rehearse small, precise inner acts of being — kindness toward a part that feels abandoned, steady confidence in a decision, the sense of being guided by a wise presence. When persistent attention repeatedly treats that new identity as actual, circumstances will follow because imagination organizes experience. This is not magical avoidance but a practiced psychological reversal: replant the inner soil, water it with sustained feeling, and watch how the outer landscape begins to answer.

When the Wells Run Dry: Lament, Divine Silence, and the Soul’s Thirst

Read as inner drama, Jeremiah 14 becomes a portrait of a mind in drought and the dynamics by which imagination either withholds or delivers its creative rain. The chapter opens with a declaration of dearth. This is not a meteorological report; it is a psychological diagnosis. The land, the gates, the farmers, the animals all represent functions of consciousness that depend on the continuous activity of the creative faculty. When the rain ceases, the inner landscape dries up: initiative fails, nourishment is absent, sight and appetite wither. The scene is an extended metaphor for a state of mind that has lost contact with its own imaginative supply.

Jerusalem as inner city stands for the center of awareness, the place where sense impressions are organized into identity. Its gates languish and go black because the thresholds of perception are shut down by disbelief, shame, and expectation of lack. The nobles sending their little ones to the wells and returning with empty vessels is an image of leaders or higher faculties delegating the search for sustenance to undeveloped parts of the self. These little ones represent hopeful attempts, small evidences of desire, sent to familiar sources that used to provide. They come back empty because the operative source—the creative imagining that used to supply life—has been neglected or contradicted.

Shame and covered heads mark the recognition of inner insufficiency. Shame is the reflex of an ego that measures itself against imagined standards and finds itself wanting. The plowmen ashamed do the work of the mind that cultivates reality; when rain ceases these workers are dishonored. The hind that calves and then leaves the field because there is no grass is instinct and creative impulse abandoning outer activity when the inner environ cannot sustain growth. Wild asses standing in high places, snuffing the wind like dragons, with eyes failing because there is no grass, are the senses and primal drives looking for sustenance in places where imagination has not prepared abundance. There is movement and aspiration but nothing to feed it.

Into this condition the voice of petition in the text speaks: O Lord, though our iniquities testify against us, do thou it for thy name's sake. This is the inner plea, the mind confessing guilt and asking for rescue. Psychologically, sin and backsliding are language for the habits and beliefs that have wandered from the source. The plea has sincerity, yet the text immediately shifts to a striking pronouncement: Thus have they loved to wander, they have not refrained their feet; therefore the LORD doth not accept them. Here creative imagination is not an external deity who arbitrarily withholds; it is the operative law of consciousness refusing to cooperate with contradictory, divided states. If the inner life delights in wandering—habitual imagination of lack, avoidance of discipline, flirtation with contradictory beliefs—then the faculty that manifests will not accept ritual pleas that are unbacked by changed inner scene.

The chapter contains a harsh but clarifying command to Jeremiah: Pray not for this people for their good. Read psychologically, this is not counsel to abandon compassion. It is a precise statement about the nature of effective inner work. To continue begging from imagination while maintaining the trance of lack is to create inner friction. It is often the case that well-intentioned petitions, prayers, and moral affirmations function as anesthetics over an unchanged subconscious. The creative imagination will not obey words that contradict a persistent underlying feeling or habitual imagery. Thus the proclamation that offerings and fasting will not be accepted exposes the impotence of mere external rites divorced from inner imagining. The promise that the people will be consumed by sword, famine, and pestilence is the inevitable consequence of sustained inner contradiction; psychological drought, left unaddressed, brings collapse in relationship, resources, and health—literal or figurative.

The prophecy against false prophets is a crucial psychology lesson. Prophets in the chapter prophesy peace and assured safety; they tell the populace what their ears want to hear. These are the voices of denial, rationalization, and wishful thinking. They comfort without changing the root images that create the experience. The inner faculty that fashions reality recognizes this hollowness and answers by letting those voices be consumed by the consequence they falsely denied. In the inner economy, lies about reality eventually self-destruct because they are unsupported by the living imaginal pulse.

The invitation to let eyes run down with tears night and day, to lament for the virgin daughter broken with a great breach, recasts the drama in the terms of grieving attention. Tears, here, are concentrated feeling and attention that acknowledge loss. The virgin daughter of the people is the original, uncorrupted creative faculty—the pure imagining that once produced life. When it is broken, the proper response is not denial or empty ritual but heartfelt witnessing. Sustained compassionate feeling is the solvent in which false scripts dissolve and new forms are conceived. This is not pathology glorified; it is the method by which contrition, clarity, and renewed imagining re-activate creative power.

The visions of slain in the field and sick with famine in the city are the transparent outcomes that mirror inner states. When imagination indentures itself to scarcity, external circumstances report back the truth. The prophet and the priest going into lands they know not indicate that both reason and supposed piety become strangers to their own system when the root activity of consciousness is misaligned. In such times people question whether the creative power has rejected them: Hast thou utterly rejected Judah? Hast thy soul lothed Zion? These anguished questions are the mind's experience of separation from its own imaginings. Yet the subsequent lines enact the corrective: Do not abhor us, for thy name's sake; remember, break not thy covenant with us. Here lies the pivot: a shift from bargaining and blame to appeal that acknowledges imagination as the maker of all things and requests a restoration of covenantal intimacy. It is a return to recognizing that the creative faculty is not external, punitive, or capricious, but the very power that fashioned the self.

The final rhetorical question about the vanities of the Gentiles that can cause rain underscores the chapter's teaching on source. No external idol, political scheme, or outward strategy can generate the inner moisture. Apprentices of the mind must learn to wait upon imagination, to cultivate the inner weather by deliberately living in the scene of the desired state. The affirmation that the Lord made all these things is an admission that the reservoir is within. The way out of the famine is not frantic policies, nor louder proclamations, but the slow art of interior revision: to imagine scenes implying restoration, to live in those scenes inwardly with sensory detail and feeling, and thus to allow the rain to fall.

Practically the chapter instructs on how imagination creates and transforms reality. The creative faculty responds to the prevailing inner drama. When the drama is wandering, contradictory, and unrepentant, manifestation dries up. When attention is trained in sustained, contrite, imaginative feeling—when vision and emotion are married—the inner sky clouds over and rain issues forth. False prophets and empty rituals must be exposed and released; they are temporary scripts that will be consumed if they are not aligned with the deeper image. Lament and witnessing are necessary steps because they destroy denial and free the imagination to conceive anew.

This reading makes Jeremiah 14 useful as a map for personal recovery of creative functioning. The stages are diagnosis of drought, removal of false consolations, sustained acknowledgment of loss, and reengagement with the inner covenant. The instruments are not arguments or external bargains but scenes lived inwardly until they become unquestioned facts of consciousness. The chapter reminds us that nothing in the outer field can give rain that the inward land has rejected. The restoration lies in recognizing the imagination as both the Lord who withholds and the Lord who restores when the mind returns to faithful envisioning. In that return, the gates of the inner city brighten, the plowmen regain their confidence, the animals of instinct find pasture, and the whole landscape is rewatered by the renewing rains of a rightly ordered imagination.

Common Questions About Jeremiah 14

How can Jeremiah 14 inform my manifestation or imagination practice?

Use Jeremiah 14 as instruction for manifestation: identify the 'drought' in your experience as an inner assumption and reframe it by sustained imagining of the desired end (Jeremiah 14). Do not try to force external evidence; instead cultivate the feeling of satisfaction, gratitude, and provision as if the harvest is already present. When the prophets of fear arise, dismiss them by returning to a single, convincing inner scene that contains the fulfilment you seek; persist in that state until sleep consolidates it. Practical imagination practice here is inner work: live mentally in the place where there is rain, food and peace, and the outer circumstances will catch up.

What does Jeremiah 14 say about drought and how might Neville Goddard interpret it?

Jeremiah 14 portrays a literal drought and famine as the outward mirror of a people’s inward drought: trust has failed, prophets deceive, and the land is chapt (Jeremiah 14). Neville Goddard would point out that the drought described is a state of consciousness manifested outwardly; lack in the field corresponds to lack in imagination. The Lord’s refusal to accept empty ritual until the heart is changed teaches that mere words do not alter being; instead assume the fulfilled state—the inner rain of faith and thanksgiving—and live from that assumption until the senses confirm it. Read as inner scripture, the passage calls you to change your inner scene so the outer will follow.

What practical meditation or visualization exercises can be drawn from Jeremiah 14?

From Jeremiah 14 derive meditations that turn inner drought into rain: begin by closing your eyes and imagining a simple, sensory scene of abundance—a field green with grass, water in the wells, people rejoicing—hold this scene five to ten minutes until the feeling of fulfillment is vivid (Jeremiah 14). Next, rehearse a short evening scene in which you give thanks for the provision as if it were already realized, allowing the feeling to carry you to sleep. When doubts arise, return calmly to the scene rather than argue; repetition and emotional conviction will recondition your assumptions and bring the outer results in time.

How do Neville Goddard's principles of assumption and imagination illuminate Jeremiah 14's prayers?

Neville Goddard teaches that prayer is an imaginative act and assumption is the law that brings experience into being; applying that to Jeremiah 14 shows the prophet's lament and the Lord's refusal of empty ritual as a call to authentic imaginative prayer (Jeremiah 14). The false prophets prophesying peace are those who hold contradictory assumptions; true prayer is the persistent, living assumption of the fulfilled desire, felt as real. Thus the solutions in Jeremiah are not petitions for external fixes but disciplined inner living in the state where rain and plenty already exist; when your imagination is settled in that state, the world rearranges to reflect it.

Is Jeremiah 14 calling for external change or inner repentance according to consciousness teaching?

Jeremiah 14 calls primarily for inner repentance: the drought is remedied when the people change their state, acknowledge wickedness, and cease false prophecy, which in consciousness terms means abandoning untrue assumptions and living in a new conviction (Jeremiah 14). Consciousness teaching says outer calamities are expressions of inner states, so the passage urges inward turning rather than merely external remedies. Repentance is not guilt alone but an imaginative reversal—assume the state of restoration, cling to it with feeling, and act from that inner reality. When you break the habit of imagining scarcity and instead dwell in abundance, the visible world naturally aligns with your sustained inner state.